Which fallacy makes a general claim based on insufficient evidence, such as a single incident?

Prepare for the EAPP Grade 12 Test. Enhance your skills with detailed flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Boost your confidence and get exam-ready today!

Multiple Choice

Which fallacy makes a general claim based on insufficient evidence, such as a single incident?

Recognizing when a broad conclusion is drawn from too little evidence. A hasty generalization happens when you take one or a few examples and treat them as representative of an entire group, leading to a sweeping claim from insufficient data. For example, judging everyone in a town as rude after meeting just one rude person is relying on too small a sample, so the conclusion is unreliable. Ad hominem focuses on attacking a person rather than the argument, which isn’t about evidence at all. Post hoc ergo propter hoc assumes causation because one event follows another, which misreads the relationship. Bandwagon argues that something is true because many people believe it or do it, which appeals to popularity rather than evidence.

Recognizing when a broad conclusion is drawn from too little evidence. A hasty generalization happens when you take one or a few examples and treat them as representative of an entire group, leading to a sweeping claim from insufficient data. For example, judging everyone in a town as rude after meeting just one rude person is relying on too small a sample, so the conclusion is unreliable.

Ad hominem focuses on attacking a person rather than the argument, which isn’t about evidence at all. Post hoc ergo propter hoc assumes causation because one event follows another, which misreads the relationship. Bandwagon argues that something is true because many people believe it or do it, which appeals to popularity rather than evidence.

More practice questions