Which of the following is NOT a recommended criterion for evaluating evidence in a position paper?

Prepare for the EAPP Grade 12 Test. Enhance your skills with detailed flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Boost your confidence and get exam-ready today!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is NOT a recommended criterion for evaluating evidence in a position paper?

Evaluating evidence in a position paper centers on how well the evidence supports the claim. The best evidence is typical and representative, meaning it reflects the broader situation rather than a cherry-picked example. It should be relevant, directly connected to the argument, so it helps prove the point rather than merely discussing something else. And it should be sufficient, providing enough support from credible sources to justify the conclusion instead of relying on a single item or a weak basis. The option that describes evidence as imaginative and speculative isn’t appropriate as a standard for evaluation because it relies on ideas that aren’t verifiable or backed by data. Speculation can be interesting, but it undermines credibility when used as the basis for an argument. In a strong position paper, you want evidence you can check, that actually relates to the claim, and that comes from enough solid sources to form a convincing case.

Evaluating evidence in a position paper centers on how well the evidence supports the claim. The best evidence is typical and representative, meaning it reflects the broader situation rather than a cherry-picked example. It should be relevant, directly connected to the argument, so it helps prove the point rather than merely discussing something else. And it should be sufficient, providing enough support from credible sources to justify the conclusion instead of relying on a single item or a weak basis.

The option that describes evidence as imaginative and speculative isn’t appropriate as a standard for evaluation because it relies on ideas that aren’t verifiable or backed by data. Speculation can be interesting, but it undermines credibility when used as the basis for an argument. In a strong position paper, you want evidence you can check, that actually relates to the claim, and that comes from enough solid sources to form a convincing case.

More practice questions